🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, coercive messages persisted. Originally, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, subsequently from law enforcement directly. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was summoned to the local precinct and told clearly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.

The leather artisan is among those fighting a high-value redevelopment plan where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – faces razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is exceptional in the world," states the protester. "But the plan aims to destroy our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of this community stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and elite residences that loom over the neighborhood. Residences are constructed informally and frequently lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is permeated by the overpowering odor of open sewers.

To some, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of luxury high-rises, neat parks, contemporary malls and apartments with proper sanitation is an optimistic future achieved.

"We lack proper healthcare, roads or water management and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," says a tea vendor, fifty-six, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The only way is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Local Protest

Yet certain residents, like Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

Everyone acknowledges that Dharavi, long neglected as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing investment and development. But they fear that this project – without public consultation – is one that will convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, forcing out the lower-caste, migrant communities who have lived there since generations ago.

This involved these excluded, displaced people who developed the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of community resilience and business activity, whose output is estimated at between one million dollars and $2m a year, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.

Resettlement Issues

Of the roughly a million people living in the packed 220-hectare zone, fewer than half will be able for new homes in the redevelopment, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to finish. Additional residents will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the far outskirts of the metropolis, risking divide a historic neighborhood. A portion will receive no residences at all.

Those allowed to continue living in Dharavi will be provided apartments in tower blocks, a major break from the evolved, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has maintained this area for many years.

Commercial activities from tailoring to pottery and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be relocated to a specific "commercial zone" far from homes.

Livelihood Crisis

For residents like Shaikh, a leather artisan and multi-generational inhabitant to live in the slum, the plan presents a survival challenge. His makeshift, multi-level operation produces apparel – sharp blazers, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – marketed in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and abroad.

His family lives in the rooms below and employees and garment workers – migrants from north India – also sleep on-site, allowing him to afford their labour. Away from Dharavi's enclave, Mumbai rents are typically significantly more expensive for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

At the government offices nearby, a visual representation of the redevelopment plan depicts a contrasting outlook. Slickly dressed inhabitants gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, acquiring international baguettes and pastries and socializing on a patio adjacent to Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. This depicts a complete departure from the affordable idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that maintains local residents.

"This isn't improvement for our community," states the artisan. "This constitutes a huge property transaction that will make it unaffordable for our community to continue."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the business conglomerate. Headed by a powerful tycoon – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the national leader – the business group has been subject to claims of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Although local authorities describes it as a partnership, the business group invested $950m for its 80% stake. A case claiming that the project was questionably assigned to the developer is pending in the top court.

Continued Intimidation

After they started to vocally oppose the development, protesters and community members state they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – comprising phone calls, explicit warnings and implications that criticizing the development was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by people they allege work for the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c