🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.